6
0
Fork 0

Code generated for signals use wrong direction. #19

Geschlossen
vor 5 Jahren von MicheleC geöffnet · 3 Kommentare
MicheleC hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

With reference to https://mirror.git.trinitydesktop.org/gitea/deloptes/dbus-1-tqt-example/src/branch/master/4e, the code generated for the two signals in ObjectManager have the wrong direction. They should be "out" signals, but the generated code says they are "in" signals. This caused the service to not be displayed properly in d-feet. See discussion in #7 for further details.

With reference to https://mirror.git.trinitydesktop.org/gitea/deloptes/dbus-1-tqt-example/src/branch/master/4e, the code generated for the two signals in ObjectManager have the wrong direction. They should be "out" signals, but the generated code says they are "in" signals. This caused the service to not be displayed properly in d-feet. See discussion in #7 for further details.
deloptes hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Mitarbeiter

As mentioned in #7, when this was discovered, even if one sets direction="out" in the xml specification, it still generates the code with direction "in".

The default direction for a signal should be always "out".

As mentioned in #7, when this was discovered, even if one sets direction="out" in the xml specification, it still generates the code with direction "in". The default direction for a signal should be always "out".
MicheleC hat diesen Issue vor 5 Jahren zum R14.1.0 release Meilenstein hinzugefügt
MicheleC hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller
Besitzer

Hi Emanoil, during my lunch break I took a look at your PR. It works correctly but there are some unnecessary code changes.

I have prepared PR #22 partially based on your work: this also improves code related to signal emission, which is only called (and supposed to be called) for signals, no methods. Please review and let me know what you think.

Hi Emanoil, during my lunch break I took a look at your PR. It works correctly but there are some unnecessary code changes.<br> I have prepared PR #22 partially based on your work: this also improves code related to signal emission, which is only called (and supposed to be called) for signals, no methods. Please review and let me know what you think.
MicheleC hat vor 5 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller
Besitzer

Solved by PR #22.

Solved by PR #22.
MicheleC hat diesen Issue vor 5 Jahren geschlossen
Anmelden, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen.
Kein Meilenstein
Niemand zuständig
2 Beteiligte
Nachrichten
Fällig am

Kein Fälligkeitsdatum gesetzt.

Abhängigkeiten

Keine Abhängigkeiten gesetzt.

Referenz: TDE/dbus-1-tqt#19
Laden…
Hier gibt es bis jetzt noch keinen Inhalt.