Haaraa/tagia ei määritelty
r14.1.x
master
fix/kxkb-450
feat/shutdownd-dialog-border
feat/whatever
feat/kdesktop
feat/layouts
issue/270/tdebase
r14.0.x
v3.5.13-sru
issue/227
fix/kicker-clock-build-dependency
feat/pkg-config
branding/kde_to_tde2
feat/fix-suspend-code
r14.1.1
r14.1.0
r14.0.13
r14.0.12
r14.0.11
r14.0.10
r14.0.9
r14.0.8
r14.0.7
r14.0.6
r14.0.5
r14.0.4
r14.0.3
r14.0.2
r14.0.1
r14.0.0
v3.5.13.2
v3.5.13.1
v3.5.13
Tunnisteet
General - need additional info from contributor PR/keep-branch
Pull request - do not delete branch after merging PR/not-ok
Pull request - need fixing PR/rfc
Pull request - request for comments PR/update-trans
Pull request - update to translation files needed PR/wip
Pull request - work in progress RS/R14.0.x
Related to R14.0.x series RS/R14.1.x
Related to R14.1.x series SL/critical
Severity level - critical SL/major
Severity level - major SL/minor
Severity level - minor SL/normal
Severity level - normal SL/regression
Severity level - regression from previous version SL/trivial
Severity level - trivial SL/wishlist
Severity level - wishlist request ST/duplicate
Status - duplicate of another issue ST/invalid
Status - invalid report ST/notourproblem
Status - not our problem ST/rejected
Status - rejected ST/wontfix
Status - won't fix ST/worksforme
Status - works for me, unable to reproduce
Aseta tunniste
Tyhjennä tunnisteet
GE/need-info
General - need additional info from contributor PR/keep-branch
Pull request - do not delete branch after merging PR/not-ok
Pull request - need fixing PR/rfc
Pull request - request for comments PR/update-trans
Pull request - update to translation files needed PR/wip
Pull request - work in progress RS/R14.0.x
Related to R14.0.x series RS/R14.1.x
Related to R14.1.x series SL/critical
Severity level - critical SL/major
Severity level - major SL/minor
Severity level - minor SL/normal
Severity level - normal SL/regression
Severity level - regression from previous version SL/trivial
Severity level - trivial SL/wishlist
Severity level - wishlist request ST/duplicate
Status - duplicate of another issue ST/invalid
Status - invalid report ST/notourproblem
Status - not our problem ST/rejected
Status - rejected ST/wontfix
Status - won't fix ST/worksforme
Status - works for me, unable to reproduce
Ei tunnistetta
GE/need-info
PR/keep-branch
PR/not-ok
PR/rfc
PR/update-trans
PR/wip
RS/R14.0.x
RS/R14.1.x
SL/critical
SL/major
SL/minor
SL/normal
SL/regression
SL/trivial
SL/wishlist
ST/duplicate
ST/invalid
ST/notourproblem
ST/rejected
ST/wontfix
ST/worksforme
Merkkipaalu
Aseta merkkipaalu
Tyhjennä merkkipaalu
Ei kohteita
Ei merkkipaalua
Käsittelijä
Osoita käyttäjille
Tyhjennä käsittelijä
Ei käsittelijää
3 osallistujaa
Ilmoitukset
Määräpäivä
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.
Määräpäivää ei asetettu.
Depends on
Reference: TDE/tdebase#168
Viittaa uudesa ongelmassa
Sisältöä ei vielä ole.
Poista haara '%!s(<nil>)'
Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?
Ei
Kyllä
When I mount an encrypted drive Konqueror prompts me to input password to decrypt it. The window title says "Decrypt Storage Device" but I just can't locate it in the source code with greping. Where does that string come from? I'd like to translate it.
There seem to be two problems for this string:
i18n()
=> the string is hardcoded and therefore not part of the POT/PO files – see tdeioslave/media/mediamanager/dialog.cpp and tdeioslave/media/mounthelper/dialog.cppMaybe we could change the string also in r14.0.x branch, because unlock is more appropriate for the operation that is being performed.
In R14.0.x branch, the lock/unlock operations are referred to as encrypted/decrypted and the status of a disk would be shown as such. changing the string to Unlock may be confusing to the users. The icon file names are also namned accordingly, so we should probably not modify the string in my opinion.
If we want to translate the string, we should probably do it through a PR here. So in my opinion we should not port the change done in PR #169 in R14.0.x
In essence, the current encrypt / decrypt naming in R14.0.x is confusing to the users because the encrypted partition is actually locked / unlocked. So it seems more appropriate to fix also other strings that use encrypt / decrypt, even though the methods in the R14.0.x branch are called encrypt / decrypt.
yes, as we discussed in IRC, that is ok.
What should we do about this issue? Close given #169 solved the orinigal problem?
Should we close this issue?
Yes.