Currently TQt/TQtInterface headers follow the [lowercase class name].h naming pattern (e.g. #include <tqstring.h>).
It would be nice to have [class name] style header file names (e.g. #include <TQString>).
Not a priority, just a wishlist-grade suggestion. I'll probably look at this myself once TQtInterface is merged even though having to figure out the build system of TQt is a scary thought.
Currently TQt/TQtInterface headers follow the `[lowercase class name].h` naming pattern (e.g. `#include <tqstring.h>`).
It would be nice to have `[class name]` style header file names (e.g. `#include <TQString>`).
Not a priority, just a wishlist-grade suggestion. I'll probably look at this myself once TQtInterface is merged even though having to figure out the build system of TQt is a scary thought.
Currently TQt/TQtInterface headers follow the
[lowercase class name].h
naming pattern (e.g.#include <tqstring.h>
).It would be nice to have
[class name]
style header file names (e.g.#include <TQString>
).Not a priority, just a wishlist-grade suggestion. I'll probably look at this myself once TQtInterface is merged even though having to figure out the build system of TQt is a scary thought.
Hi Philippe,
already on the roadmap, but after the tqt3/tqtinterface merge, so there is no double work for tq* and ntq* header files :-)