6
0
Fork 0

change exec_process to execute_process #3

Zusammengeführt
SlavekB hat 1 Commits von issue/2/exec_process nach master vor 6 Jahren zusammengeführt
Ghost hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert

This should bring back xmms in the game.

Xmms is still provided within Slackware and should be in the next release (Slackware-15.0)

This should bring back xmms in the game. Xmms is still provided within Slackware and should be in the next release (Slackware-15.0)
SlavekB hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

I'm not sure why the XMMS_CLFAGS and XMMS_LIBS variables are set before calling xmms_config? Why are parameters not entered directly in a call? Setting these variables seems to me unnecessary.

I'm not sure why the `XMMS_CLFAGS` and `XMMS_LIBS` variables are set before calling `xmms_config`? Why are parameters not entered directly in a call? Setting these variables seems to me unnecessary.
Ghost hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller

either through a variable or within ' ', --cflags and --libs have to be enclosed. I get errors otherwise.

It also works like this:

set( HAVE_XMMS 1 )
EXECUTE_PROCESS( COMMAND ${XMMS_CONFIG} '--cflags' OUTPUT_VARIABLE XMMS_INCLUDES )
EXECUTE_PROCESS( COMMAND ${XMMS_CONFIG} '--libs'   OUTPUT_VARIABLE XMMS_LIBS     )

Do you prefer that way?

either through a variable or within ' ', --cflags and --libs have to be enclosed. I get errors otherwise. It also works like this: ``` set( HAVE_XMMS 1 ) EXECUTE_PROCESS( COMMAND ${XMMS_CONFIG} '--cflags' OUTPUT_VARIABLE XMMS_INCLUDES ) EXECUTE_PROCESS( COMMAND ${XMMS_CONFIG} '--libs' OUTPUT_VARIABLE XMMS_LIBS ) ``` Do you prefer that way?
SlavekB hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

Yes, I prefer this way without variables. Do you make a change in commit?

Note: Do not be afraid to use ammend on an existing patch and then push using --force

Yes, I prefer this way without variables. Do you make a change in commit? Note: Do not be afraid to use ammend on an existing patch and then push using --force
Ghost hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller

Ok, I'll have a shot at "ammend" and...and pussssh...

Ok, I'll have a shot at "ammend" and...and pussssh...
MicheleC hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

git push -f origin HEAD 😉

git push -f origin HEAD :wink:
MicheleC hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

if you want to modify your previous commit, do as follow:

  1. create new commit with additional changes

  2. git reset --soft <commit before all your commits>

  3. git commit

This will create a new single commit with all your previous changes.

Then:

git push -f origin HEAD

if you want to modify your previous commit, do as follow: 1) create new commit with additional changes 2) git reset --soft \<commit before all your commits\> 3) git commit This will create a new single commit with all your previous changes. Then: git push -f origin HEAD
Ghost hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller

didn't work.
ok, learning the next thousand git cmd is on my TODO list

didn't work. ok, learning the next thousand git cmd is on my TODO list
SlavekB hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

Here are several options:

  1. Make a new commit and then use rebase to squash.
  2. Make new changes, use git add --all and then git commit --amend
  3. Make git reset HEAD~1 and continue as if the previous commit did not exist
Here are several options: 1. Make a new commit and then use rebase to squash. 2. Make new changes, use `git add --all` and then `git commit --amend` 3. Make `git reset HEAD~1` and continue as if the previous commit did not exist
Ghost hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Ersteller

I've deleted everything, I'm done for today and that shitty git.

I've deleted everything, I'm done for today and that shitty git.
SlavekB hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

Small note: For a branch name, use only the issue number without #. As Gitea tries to parse #number as a reference to issue / pull-request, then using # in the branch name leads to a cyclical link.

Small note: For a branch name, use only the issue number without #. As Gitea tries to parse #number as a reference to issue / pull-request, then using # in the branch name leads to a cyclical link.
SlavekB hat diesen Pull-Request vor 6 Jahren geschlossen
SlavekB hat vor 6 Jahren kommentiert
Besitzer

Merged and pushed upstream.

Merged and pushed upstream.
SlavekB löschte die Branch issue/2/exec_process vor 6 Jahren
SlavekB hat diesen Issue vor 6 Jahren zum R14.0.6 release Meilenstein hinzugefügt
Der Pull Request wurde als 2a97cbef31 gemergt.
Anmelden, um an der Diskussion teilzunehmen.
Keine Reviewer
Kein Meilenstein
Niemand zuständig
3 Beteiligte
Nachrichten
Fällig am

Kein Fälligkeitsdatum gesetzt.

Abhängigkeiten

Keine Abhängigkeiten gesetzt.

Referenz: TDE/tdenetwork#3
Laden…
Hier gibt es bis jetzt noch keinen Inhalt.